Lorraine Day, M.D.
P.O. Box 8
Thousand Palms, CA 92276

November 3, 2003

Dr. Dean Edell
900 Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1450

Dear Dr. Edell:

Recently, I received in the mail an audiotape of your program that aired on October 5, 2003, in which you said many things about me that were either untrue, or were attempts to make me guilty by association, or were innuendoes carefully crafted to smear my reputation.

I realize that you personally know nothing about me nor do you personally know anything about Ernst Zundel. What you said on the air obviously was prepared for you by your superiors and handed to you with instructions for you to promote what can only be defined as outright propaganda.

Briefly, the facts are these. I was asked by my friend of 13 years, Ingrid Rimland Zundel, if I would be willing to fly to Toronto to medically examine her husband, Ernst Zundel, who is also a friend of mine. Ernst, a German by birth and a graphic artist by occupation, had immigrated to Canada as a young man but had moved to the U.S. two years ago when he married Ingrid, a writer and a U.S. citizen. Ernst is 64 years old.

Ernst and Ingrid had been living peacefully in Tennessee for two years when on February 5, 2003, while he and a friend were framing some of his paintings in anticipation of an exhibition of his work, Ernst was arrested by five officers - one sheriff and four immigration officers, WITHOUT a warrant, placed in handcuffs, forbidden to call his lawyer (his wife was also forbidden to call their lawyer) and hauled away without being given any explanation as to where he was being taken. (Who would have thought that could happen in America?)

Within two weeks, Ernst was illegally deported to Canada, WITHOUT a hearing, and has been in prison, in 23 hour a day lock-down, since that time.

His "crime"? He is accused of missing an immigration interview, hardly a "crime" worthy of this type of draconian imprisonment. The truth is that Ernst Zundel DID receive a notice for an immigration interview. His attorney sent a letter to the Immigration Service asking that the interview be re-scheduled because he (the attorney) was not available on that day, a legitimate request that always had been routinely accommodated by the Immigration Service for any lawyer.

No answer was forthcoming from the Immigration Service. Ernst Zundel's attorney then sent a second letter, return receipt requested, again stating the need for a re-scheduling of Ernst's immigration interview.

No answer was forthcoming from the Immigration Service.

Months passed and Ernst received nothing from the Immigration Service which he did not feel was unusual as they had told him that it would take many months for his case to be processed.

Suddenly, on February 5, 2003, the Immigration Officers appeared, without warning, to arrest him WITHOUT a warrant. Obviously, the excuse they gave for arresting him has no validity. It is virtually unheard of for anyone in America to be hauled off to PRISON in handcuffs because of a missed immigration interview, and then held in 23 hour-a-day lockdown and branded a "terrorist."

So what is Ernst Zundel's REAL "crime?"

First, you need to know that it is AGAINST THE LAW! in Canada, Germany, France, Switzerland and, I believe, Australia and Austria - with punishment by imprisonment or fine - to QUESTION the establishment's rendition of the "Holocaust!"

In addition, "human rights" tribunals have been set up in Canada where a person can be charged with a "human rights" violation - a thought crime - and be put on trial without the protections given by a court of law, meaning that opponents can testify against him in secret and make charges of any type, yet the person "on trial" has no right to know who is testifying against him, what the secret testimony is about, and the person on trial has no right to cross examine the one who is testifying against him. Therefore, it is IMPOSSIBLE for the person on trial to defend himself of the charges - since he has no way of knowing what the charges are!

In addition, in these "human rights" tribunals in Canada it has been declared that "Truth is NO defense." In other words, it doesn't matter that what the defendant said is TRUE, it only matters that someone else doesn't like the defendant revealing the TRUTH!

What a shameful state of affairs for supposedly civilized countries! This is just as bad or worse than the most wretched tyrannical dictatorship of a third world country.

This should raise a bright red flag to any thinking person, especially any thinking American. WHY would laws be passed to punish people for investigating history? Who would pass such laws? And WHAT ARE THEY TRYING TO HIDE?

How Outrageous! Being imprisoned for investigating history? And this man was essentially kidnapped illegally from his residence in the U.S., by U.S. government officials, WITHOUT a warrant, and illegally extradited to Canada - - - ALL for the "crime" of investigating history and disagreeing with the establishment's viewpoint on the "holocaust"!

What did Ernst Zundel find when he investigated the establishment's rendition of the "Holocaust?" He found many things amiss, including exaggerated numbers of those supposedly killed in the concentration camps, the method by which they died, etc.

So who is behind this reprehensible travesty of justice against Ernst Zundel? Who wants to repress ANYONE who investigates history, including the supposed "Holocaust," and ANYONE who disagrees with the official party line?

The answer: Those who gain the most from perpetuating the establishment's version of the "Holocaust," those who have reaped billions of dollars in reparations from Germany for the "Holocaust", those who collect billions of dollars in "loans" from the U.S. - "loans" that are NEVER repaid, those who use those funds to keep other groups of people, including the Palestinians, the Iraqis, and soon to be many other countries, under totalitarian control and in abject poverty.

Who are these people? The Zionist Jews! Notice, I said the "Zionist" Jews, NOT Jews in general. There are many Jews who do NOT agree with what the Zionist Jews are doing, but the media, which is controlled by the Zionist Jews, rarely allows the opinions of their fellow disagreeing Jews to be publicized.

For more information, please investigate www.zundelsite.org or www.rense.com

Since Ernst Zundel has been in prison, his blood pressure has risen so high that he has been in danger of a stroke. He has been given blood pressure medication that is causing adverse side effects. Also, he has developed a painful mass on his sternum (breastbone).

I was asked by his wife, my long-time friend Ingrid Rimland Zundel, if I would be willing to fly to Toronto and examine him medically and to testify in court regarding his medical condition.

I immediately agreed to do that.

So, in brief, these are the facts. I was asked, as a physician, to examine a friend of mine, a political prisoner who is illegally imprisoned, and give a medical opinion in court regarding his medical condition.

That seems pretty simple and straight forward to me. But you, and those for whom you work, apparently want to pervert this legitimate occurrence, wrap it in numerous innuendoes, entwine my medical examination of Ernst with his beliefs and the beliefs of numerous others that he may or may not have known, tie it into my recovery from cancer by natural methods (what a trick that is!) and make it into a piece of propaganda worthy of the Stalinist era of political purges.

I am fully aware of the influence that the pharmaceutical companies have on the media. They provide millions of dollars in advertising for radio and television. They certainly do NOT want ANYONE telling people how to get well from cancer by natural methods, as I did. And the pharmaceutical companies are owned by those who hold the same political mind-set as the media barons, those who own the major newspapers, the television studios, the Hollywood movie studios and now, the majority of the radio stations.

In your comments about me in your October 5 broadcast, you first try to impose "guilt by association" on me, then you launch into a smear campaign against Ernst Zundel. You call Ernst a "hate propagandist," a "neo-nazi" and an "anti-semitic," but you give absolutely NO evidence for any of these charges.

Then you proceed to smear me by association with Ernst Zundel whom you have already smeared without any evidence.

By the way, what does any of this have to do with my getting well from cancer? Or my practice of medicine? What does this have to do with ANYTHING - except to try to destroy my reputation and my credibility so YOUR handlers can sell more drugs?

Here is a transcript of what you said, followed by my comments in bold.

"(Dr. Lorraine Day) is a heroine to a lot of you. She hasn't practiced for about ten years." (L. Day comments: This statement is obviously meant, somehow, to be a slur on my reputation. How do you define "practicing" medicine? How long has it been since YOU have "practiced" medicine? You give out medical information publicly - and so do I. So what is your point with that statement?

Must a physician see private patients in a private office in order to be considered a "practicing" physician? How about all of the physicians in administrative and research positions in Medical schools, hospitals and government positions, such as the U.S. Surgeon General? Are they any less a doctor just because they don't see patients privately, one on one? Are YOU less of a doctor because of what YOU do? (If so, then why do YOU feel qualified to give out medical information?)

"She claimed she cured her breast cancer with prayer and diet and that standard medical treatment is not good for you - the standard stuff." (L.Day comments: You obviously don't have any idea how I got well. The plan I used has Ten Steps, all of them are natural. Diet is only one of them. Trust in God is another. But there are EIGHT more steps that are just as critical for recovery as the two that you mentioned. But you chose to present my recovery in such a way as to trivialize it and make it sound absurd.

However, you are certainly CORRECT in saying that I believe "that standard medical treatment is not good for you." I'll embrace that statement all day long!)

"Well, here she reveals certain of her colors." (L. Day comments: What "colors," pray tell, am I revealing, just because I medically examine a prisoner? I have examined hundreds of prisoners in my medical career. Why is that a problem for you? And what does that have to do with my recovery from cancer? How ingeniously you link the two together, even though one has NOTHING to do with the other. I have noticed, in my many encounters with the press over the last fifteen years, how cleverly you, and others in your position, refuse to deal with the issues and instead, attack the individual's reputation with name-calling, just as you have done here - as follows!)

"There's a fellow named Zundel. Canada is trying to review a declaration as a threat to national security and to extradite him to Germany. His wife claims he (Zundel) has used herbs to cure himself of inoperable terminal cancer many years ago and he has had a recurrence because his detention would not permit him to continue taking his herbs. (L. Day comments: What does this have to do with me? I DIDN'T say that! Why do you gratuitously throw it in here? Ernst Zundel's wife has a right to say what she wants. How does it have anything to do with me? I DIDN'T say it!)

"This is a guy who basically is a hate propagandist, (L. Day comments: Oh, PLEASE! What a worn-out phrase? Where is your proof? What do you define as a "hate propagandist" - someone who says something - ANYTHING - that your employers, the Zionist Jews, don't like?)

"is a neo-nazi (L. Day comments: AGAIN - Oh, PLEASE! What is your definition of a neo-nazi? Any German who is tired of the German-bashing constantly carried on by the Zionist Jews?)

"and has for many years funded neo-nazi groups, (L. Day comments: You have not defined "neo-nazi" so your charges of funding "neo-nazi" groups are irrelevant and nothing more than smear tactics.)

"published neo-nazi and anti-semitic and holocaust denials, books such as "The Hitler we loved and why." (L. Day comments: I personally have NEVER even heard of such a book. But, if there is such a book, is freedom of speech only available to those who believe EXACTLY as YOU do?

Let's stop right here and define the word "anti-semitic." Frankly, I am sick and tired of this term. Anti-semitic means those who are against (or "hate") people who are of semitic origin. Arabs are semitic. Ernst doesn't hate Arabs nor does he hate Jews, even though Jews CAN'T even generally be classified as semites, as approximately 80% of them are descended from the Khazars from Khazaria, an area in what is now Russia, where "Gentile" barbarians, in the 9th or 10th century, purposely adopted Judaism both as a religion and as a culture.

So, 80% of ALL the Jews in the world today are actually Gentiles whose ancestors adopted the Jewish culture and/or religion centuries ago.) Reference: Koestler, Arthur (a Jewish author), The Thirteenth Tribe, 1976: Random House, Inc., New York.

Since the Zionist Jews in Israel appear to be hell-bent on extermination of the Palestinians, Israeli Zionist Jews must be classified as the most anti-semitic people on the face of the earth. It's a case of the pot calling the kettle black!

Ernst Zundel is NOT anti-semitic! He does not hate Arabs OR Jews. He has repeatedly tried to open a dialogue with Jews from various organizations, to discuss the issue of the Holocaust. But his enemies respond by burning down his house and sending him bombs through the mail - TWICE - to try to kill him. Why aren't THOSE people brought to justice and charged with HATE crimes?

So the charge of "anti-semitism" is meaningless and is nothing more than a smear tactic. That term, "anti-semitic," is used by Zionist Jews to intimidate anyone who exposes their skullduggery. It is nothing more than "bully tactics" and very unbecoming to those who use it. (I do hope you are aware of the many Jews, including Israeli Jews, who strongly DISAGREE with the tactics of the Zionists, and the many Jews who are very much AGAINST the Zionist Jews' treatment of the Palestinians.)

"(Chuckling) So here's this neo-nazi (Please see my above comments regarding the childish habit of name-calling while you simultaneously refuse to discuss the issues.)

"and who stands up for him in court to defend this guy but Lorraine Day, M.D." (L. Day comments: I was NOT in court to "defend" Ernst Zundel. I was there, as a physician, to examine him medically and to testify about his medical condition.

Do you, Dr. Edell, believe that if a man is imprisoned, whether legally or illegally imprisoned, as is the case with Mr. Zundel, the prisoner should not be allowed to be examined by a doctor? Is it your contention that human rights should only extend to those who hold opinions that agree with yours and your superiors?)

"He (Zundel) lists her as among the signers of a petition the government officials have asserted (which states), 'Mr. Zundel is an honest, outspoken man and doesn't deserve to be sent back to Germany to face a jail term, merely because he has openly questioned the accuracy and veracity of what many claim to have been a historical occurrence. (L. Day comments: Yes, indeed, I was willing and anxious to sign the petition for Ernst Zundel and I would sign it again and again, if need be. I am PROUD to be a friend of a man who is willing to risk imprisonment and risk his very life, to tell TRUTH - to expose the lies of those who plan to enslave most of the people of the world.

I don't know that I believe everything Ernst Zundel believes, because I don't KNOW everything that he believes. But I DO agree with his right to investigate the accuracy of the events of history, including World War II and what is inappropriately termed the "Holocaust."

I have long been under the impression that America allows freedom of thought and freedom of speech. Silly me!)

"Anyway - she's out there." (L. Day comments: Whatever that means! You bet I am! I am happy to be ANYWHERE that TRUTH is being told. I fervently pray that I NEVER shrink from that duty, no matter who tries to destroy my reputation.)

Since you know so little about Ernst Zundel, the following will help bring you up to speed.

Who Is Ernst Zundel And Why Is He In Jail?
By Mark Weber

For more than six months now, Ernst Zundel has been held without charge in solitary confinement in Canada on the pretext that he is a threat to national security. In fact, this 64-year-old German-born writer, publisher and civil rights activist is a political prisoner and a victim of great injustice.

Who is this man, and why is his case important?

Zundel was arrested at his home in Tennessee on Feb. 5, where he had been living peacefully with his wife, Ingrid Rimland, on the pretext that he missed an interview date with immigration authorities. Two weeks later he was deported to Canada, even though his wife is an American citizen.

Claiming that he is a national security threat, Canadian authorities have been holding Zundel since Feb. 19. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) - something like the American FBI - supports this charge by citing tenuous and years-old ties by Zundel to "white supremacist" groups. While acknowledging that he is not violent himself, CSIS also argues that material published by Zundel might cause "like-minded individuals to engage in violence."

There is absolutely no basis for the "security threat" charge. Zundel's life is an open book. He is a peaceful man with no record of violence. During the 40 years he lived in Canada, he was never convicted of a crime. In fact, he has himself been a victim of hate and violence. He survived at least three attempts on his life, including a devastating arson attack against his residence.

Jewish groups are demanding that Zundel be deported to Germany, where he faces years of imprisonment for the "thought crime" of "denying the Holocaust." ("Holocaust denial" is against the law in Germany, France, Switzerland and some other European countries.)

Zundel is in prison not because his views are unpopular, or because he's a "security risk." He's in prison because Jewish groups want him there. He's a prisoner because he promotes views that the Jewish-Zionist lobby considers harmful to its interests.

This lobby is the decisive, critical factor in the decades-old campaign to silence him. The only sustained and institutionalized effort to imprison him has come from this lobby, which includes the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the Canadian Holocaust Remembrance Association, and the League for Human Rights of B'nai B'rith (with the Anti-Defamation League, its counterpart in the US).

A few prominent Canadians have been speaking out against the unjust treatment of Ernst Zundel.

One such person is Bill Dunphy, a veteran investigative journalist and editor for the daily Hamilton Spectator. He spent six years probing Canada's "white supremacist" movement, and got to know Zundel personally. Although he has no sympathy for Zundel's views, in a hard-hitting column (Hamilton Spectator, May 14) he told readers:

"Our government has seized and branded Ernst Zundel, stripped him of his human rights, tried him in secret and found him wanting, and will now hand him over to a foreign government anxious to throw him in jail..."... Zundel - who did this country a favour by wiping off the books our disgraceful False News laws - has never once been convicted of a criminal offence in this country, never once found to have violated the hate crime laws that rest snugly around the throat of free expression in this country.

"Calculating correctly that there was no political cost, no 'down side, to slipping on the jackboots to kick a reviled old man out of our country' our government cobbled together their best insults and innuendo, and Lord knows what secret 'evidence' and branded Ernst Zundel a threat to national security.

"I know this man, his local and international contacts and I know this movement. And after reading the 58-page 'unclassified, summary of the government's case, I can assure you there is no justice here. Their 'evidence' is riddled with errors and misinformation, hearsay and inflammatory innuendo. Dead men walk again, and the shattered bits of shoddy secret networks long since collapsed under the weight of their own ineptitude are made whole and menacing once again. It is a shameful piece of dishonest, unreliable tripe."

The trendy Toronto weekly Eye pointed out in an editorial (May 15) that "declaring Zundel a terrorist now is not the result of any startling new information," but rather 'it has to do with political pressure' ..." The paper added:

"The new security certificate admits Zundel has 'virtually no history of direct personal engagement in acts of serious violence.' It labels him a terrorist partly because he 'seeks to destroy the multicultural fabric and underpinnings of Canadian society.' Citing opposition to official multiculturalism as a type of terrorism risks expanding the war on terror to include everyone to the right of Pierre Trudeau.

"Anti-terrorism provisions should not be used as a catch-all solution. Misapplying terminology in this way damages its credibility, and undermines the efforts against real terrorism. It has also, of course, damaged the integrity of our refugee system."

Similar concerns have been voiced by the daily Times Colonist of Victoria, British Columbia. In an editorial, "Even Zundel Merits Fairness" (May 9), the paper declared:

". . .The way the federal government is trying to get rid of Zundel is wrong - it is using law that is so sweeping in its scope that it may be," as Zundel's lawyer Doug Christie argues, unconstitutional. It would allow him to be deported on evidence that amounts to mere assumption and subject him to a kangaroo court process where no defense can be mounted.

"The Canadian Security and Intelligence Service calls Zundel the patriarch of Canada's white supremacist movement." It argues he is a risk to national security - a finding essential for his deportation under this procedure - because he is trying to 'destroy the
multicultural fabric and underpinnings of Canadian society.'

". . .Most Canadians would be surprised to learn that the country's multicultural fabric could be torn apart or society toppled by Zundel's rants which are not, in fact, broadcast widely. But this is the basis for CSIS's security certificate against Zundel."

The Canadian Association for Free Expression (CAFE), a leading free speech advocacy group, is demanding Zundel's immediate release. "Mr. Zundel is quite literally a political prisoner," says CAFE director Paul Fromm, who has also been acting as Zundel's legal representative in his detention hearings. "He is being held in solitary confinement solely for the non-violent expression of his political views."

The allegation that Zundel might be a threat to national security "is mischievous nonsense," says Fromm. "Zundel has been politically active in Canada for 40 years. He's a public figure. His writings and speeches are available on-line. He's been investigated for years by the police. He's an open book. Zundel has never advocated or practiced violence, nor have his followers," Fromm adds. "He's a pacifist and a publisher."

A Life of Struggle

Ernst Zundel, a towering figure in the worldwide Holocaust revisionist movement, was born in 1939 in a small town in the Black Forest region of southwestern Germany. He emigrated to Canada at the age of 19, where he soon married and became the father of two sons. It wasn't long before he made a name for himself as a successful graphic artist whose work appeared, for example, on the front cover of Canada's national news magazine, Maclean's.

Setting aside a thriving career, he resolved to dedicate himself to the great task, as he sees it, of redeeming the sullied reputation of his fellow Germans. Through his Samisdat publishing house he distributed worldwide a prodigious quantity of books, booklets, leaflets, newsletters, and audio and video cassettes. Simon Wiesenthal, the well-known "Nazi hunter," has called Zundel the world's number one distributor of allegedly dangerous literature and cassettes.

He has written countless booklets, newsletters and essays. He is a prodigious publisher, a one-man public relations firm, and an able public speaker and organizer. A dauntless leader in struggle against apparently insurmountable odds and seemingly invincible adversaries, no revisionist is more tenacious, dedicated and courageous.

Ernst Zundel, who sometimes describes himself as a "Swabian peasant" is an outgoing, good-humored man who is blessed with a rare combination of unflagging optimism and practical ability. He maintains this infectious spirit even under very trying conditions. He is an unusually alert and sensitive individual with a keen understanding of human nature. He knows how to persuade, cajole and encourage his supporters to give their best for the greater good. He inspires confidence, loyalty and affection.

Zundel is probably best known for his central role in the "Holocaust Trials" of 1985 and 1988. He was brought to court in Toronto on a charge of "publishing false news," and specifically for publishing a reprint edition of a booklet entitled, Did Six Million Really Die?.

To wage the legal battle that was forced upon him, he brought together an impressive international team of revisionist scholars, legal specialists, researchers, and many others. From numerous libraries and archives in North America and Europe, this group assembled at "Zundelhaus" one of the most impressive collections of evidence anywhere on this chapter of history.

Zundel's two lengthy trials - the 1985 trial lasted two months, and the 1988 trial lasted four months - have been the closest thing anywhere to full scale debates on the Holocaust issue. For the first time ever, "Holocaust survivors" and Holocaust historians were closely and critically questioned under oath about their claims and views.

Among those who testified on Zundel's behalf in the two trials were Robert Faurisson, David Irving, Mark Weber, William Lindsey, Udo Walendy, and Bradley Smith. As a result of the two trials, an enormous quantity of compelling evidence refuting the Holocaust extermination story was presented to the court and thereby was made part of the permanent public record. The most important of this evidence was the historic testimony of American gas chamber expert Fred Leuchter about his on-site forensic examination of the alleged extermination gas chambers in Poland.

Zundel was found guilty in the 1985 trial, but the verdict was set aside by the provincial appeals court. It ruled that the judge in that trial had, among other things, given improper instructions to the jury, and had improperly excluded defense evidence. In at the conclusion of the second Zundel trial, the jury declared him guilty. A few days later, he was sentenced to nine months

On appeal, Canada's Supreme Court threw out the conviction, declaring on August 27, 1992, that the archaic "false news" law under which he had been convicted was a violation of the country's Charter of Rights. This was not only a personal vindication by Canada's highest court; Ernst Zundel secured an important victory for the rights of all Canadians.

Zundel's next great legal battle was fought out before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Toronto on charges, instigated by Jewish groups, of promoting "hatred or contempt" against Jews through the Zundelsite" Internet web site (www.zundelsite.org), operated by Ingrid Rimland from the United States. In this legal action, as the Tribunal's presiding Commissioner declared, the truth or validity of the supposedly "hateful" items was not a consideration. The Tribunal ultimately ruled against Zundel, declaring the "Zundelsite" to be unlawful.

After four decades in Canada, including a failed effort to acquire Canadian citizenship, he moved to the United States, where he married Ingrid in January 2000. For two years they lived quietly in the mountain region of eastern Tennessee.

Of this remarkable man, Robert Faurisson wrote in 1988: "Zundel may once again go to prison for his research and beliefs or be threatened with deportation. All this is possible. Anything may happen when there is an intellectual crisis and a realignment of historical concepts of such a dimension. Revisionism is the great intellectual adventure of the end of this century. Whatever happens, Ernst Zundel is already the victor."

Mark Weber (weber@ihr.org) is director of the Institute for Historical Review. He was born in Portland, and was educated in his home town, Chicago, Munich and Bloomington (Indiana). The IHR is a not-for-profit educational and publishing enterprise dedicated to truth and accuracy in history. For further information, see the IHR web site (www.ihr.org), or write to: IHR, P.O. Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659, USA.

This essay originally appeared in the October 2003 issue of Community News (P.O. Box 191677, Sacramento, CA 95819, USA. thetruthisback@yahoo.com).



There is one important thing that those of you who attack TRUTH have not yet realized, and that is that God brings attention to TRUTH - God magnifies TRUTH - by allowing opposition to TRUTH. In other words, the more you and others attack the TRUTH that we are teaching, the more the general population will want to investigate this TRUTH.

When you mentioned me on your radio show, there were undoubtedly hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, of people who had never heard of me before. And YOU brought me to their attention. You have NO idea how creative people become in finding TRUTH once their minds are made curious about it. So many people are sick and they are becoming increasingly aware that orthodox medical treatments DON'T WORK! So they hear about me - from YOU - and even though you are trying to ruin my reputation and destroy my credibility, they see right through you and will not stop until they hear my message!

So, I must say THANK YOU! I could not afford to buy such widespread publicity. And you're doing it for me for FREE!

You, and others who attack truth would be much smarter to just leave us truth-tellers alone, people like Ernst Zundel, Jeff Rense, Robert Faurrison, me, and many others. But you become so obsessed with trying to stamp out truth that you cannot leave us alone. But the more you rail against us, the more you inadvertently bring people to us - the more you stimulate the curiosity of the millions who want to know truth.

Since Ernst Zundel has been wrongfully imprisoned by the enemies of TRUTH, the new people who have been attracted to his message and who are investigating the TRUTH about the "holocaust" have increased by 400%!

You see, it's IMPOSSIBLE to stamp out truth. Truth can never be stamped out because it is - Truth!

Here's an illustration: The woman who gave birth to you is your mother. That is TRUTH! You could try to deny that fact and claim that some other woman was your mother, but the woman who gave birth to you is STILL your mother. No matter how much you shouted other people down, no matter how much you might wish your falsehood to be true - it is NOT. No matter how many people you would put in prison for telling the TRUTH about who your real mother is, the TRUTH would still remain the TRUTH! The woman who gave birth to you is STILL your mother, no matter how much you might try to deny it. TRUTH can NEVER be destroyed. It will ALWAYS remain TRUTH!

Remember, Gamaliel was right when he spoke to his fellow Pharisees who wanted to kill Peter and the other apostles who were preaching the truth about Jesus Christ!

"Then stood there up one in the council, a Pharisee, named Gamaliel, a doctor of the law, held in respect among all the people. . . and said unto them (his fellow Pharisees),

'You men of Israel, take heed to yourselves what you intend to do regarding these men. . . Keep away from these men, and let them alone: for if their counsel or their work be of men, it will come to nothing. But if it is of God, you CANNOT overthrow it; for you will find that you are fighting against God!"
Acts 5:34-39.

Wise words!

Dr. Edell, since you know nothing about me nor how I got well from life-threatening cancer by totally natural methods, I am enclosing three of my videotapes and my new workbook entitled Getting Started on Getting Well, as my gift to you. Also, you may visit my web site at www.drday.com where you will find much life-saving information as well as this letter to you, and my responses to my other critics.


Lorraine Day, M.D.

Lorraine Day, M.D.
P.O. Box 8
Thousand Palms, CA 92276

November 6, 2003

Dr. Dean Edell
900 Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111

Dear Dr. Edell:

One more thing I just found out that I think you will find interesting! Today, I was told by my long-time friend, Ingrid Rimland Zundel, the wife of the man you all love to hate, that you and Dr. Theresa Crenshaw were friends.

Theresa Crenshaw and I were VERY close friends for over ten years. Theresa and I met when she was on President Reagan's AIDS Commission. After she heard me interviewed on radio on the AIDS issue, she was instrumental in arranging for me to testify to the AIDS Commission. After that we became close friends. I was the one who brought Ingrid (Zundel) and Theresa together. They also became close friends and working associates for several years.

Theresa and I both developed breast cancer at the same time. Theresa pursued the orthodox route with mastectomy, although she did initially refuse chemotherapy and radiation. But she didn't change her lifestyle irrespective of how much I tried to get her to do so. She even went so far as to have BILATERAL mastectomies on the (bad) advice of her physician, even though she had cancer in only one breast.

I gave her all of health videos, I went down to her house in San Diego to help her get on the Natural Heatlh Plan I used to get well, I helped her shop for healthy food, I prayed with her, I encouraged her to exercise outdoors, to learn to forgive, and to do all of the other things necessary to get well, but she kept on living and eating the way she always had.

Because she kept on living and eating the way she always had, a short time later she developed ovarian cancer. This time she went the orthodox route completely, having extensive brutal surgery and taking all the chemotherapy the doctors could throw at her. As you know, she was a tall, strong, strikingly beautiful woman. She didn't go down easily. The doctors had to work very hard to kill her, but they finally did.

I've seen a lot of patients die from the cancer treatment given them by doctors, but I've NEVER in all my career seen a patient given such huge quantities of poisons by the doctors, over such a long period of time, with so much intense suffering, as that which occurred in the case of my friend, Theresa Crenshaw. The doctors just kept giving her poisons until she finally died.

She and I talked on the phone frequently during those difficult times and she would often ask me to come and stay with her to give her encouragement. She knew how I felt about her decision to take orthodox therapy, but I kept silent because every patient has the right to his or her choice of treatment. It was very hard to watch my close friend being poisoned to death by my colleagues in the medical profession, to watch her slowly die such an agonizing death, to know that she could be totally well if she would only follow God's natural health plan, as I had.

How often I thought of the irony of it all: Theresa and I both developed the same disease at the same time. I followed God's Natural Plan and became totally well and cancer-free. She knew how sick I had been and how I had become totally well. And here I was, standing right in front of her, a picture of health.

But she, because of the indoctrination from the medical training that we ALL receive, which is PRO drugs and ANTI Natural healing, and because her physicians scared her into taking orthodox therapy, was slowly being killed, in the most brutal way.

On the last night of her life, as she was taken to the hospital for the last time, I got a call from a mutual friend of ours who was there at the hospital with her. Her ultimate demise was so painful and so horrible that I would never reveal it publicly. It is a terrible testimony to the darkness, shamefulness, and total failure of orthodox medicine.

I am enclosing a page of Ingrid's newsletter where she relates her view of these occurrences.

So, I just thought it might be interesting for you to know that Dr. Theresa Crenshaw, a friend of yours - was also a close friend of mine - AND a close friend of Ingrid Zundel's. What a small world!

Also, it's worth mentioning again that our mutual friend Theresa embraced orthodox therapy - and is dead, dying a very painful death. I, on the other hand, chose Natural Healing - and am very much alive and totally well!


Lorraine Day, M.D.

An excerpt from Ingrid Rimland Zundel's Newsletter

To our friends around the world:

Today is an "anniversary" of sorts - it's been eight months since Ernst was kidnapped and thrown into maximum detention. If there is one phrase that adequately summarizes this time, it must be "gritted teeth"! It has been difficult. We have all lived through many "ups" and "downs", and I just hope that Ernst is right when he keeps telling me that, after all is over, we'll come out of this more self-assured, and as he puts it, "with real stature." Let's just remember, always, that our enemies have bigger worries than Ernst Zundel. Wherever you look, their system is creaking and groaning, and if they were smart, which they are not - they're merely clever but driven by hatred that makes them make major mistakes - they would just quietly let him go, pull in their tails, and write this sordid story off as one more time when they have shot themselves in their big toe, to put it lady-like.

So let's start with the good news first - that Ernst's health problems might not be cancer. We do not know for sure, but a good friend of ours, one of the most experienced doctors in the world, flew out to Toronto at her own expense to take a look at what was going on and to give testimony that Ernst should not be in prison. This lady's name is Lorraine Day, and I should tell you briefly how I met her and why I asked her to take time off from her extremely busy schedule and pay the Toronto jailers a visit.

I met Dr. Day in the early 90's when I saw her speak up forcefully on "Sixty Minutes" about AIDS, then a brand new disease we now know was an early "terror" tool. She was a famous doctor, then Chief of Orthopedic Surgery in San Francisco, one of the hotbeds of AIDS, and she was talking of the danger of operating on patients whom she was not allowed to test for AIDS! It was incredible to me that there was a disease that dangerous that the government saw fit to protect! I thought that it was an incredible story!
I called her the next morning, told her that I was a writer with substantial credentials, and offered that I would help her put her knowledge in a book I felt would be a world-wide bestseller. I did not know that I had come upon my first "conspiracy" story, apparently hatched by an agency of my own government, according to what she told me! Of course it didn't take me long to realize that this was only one conspiracy of many where governments protect and shelter information that will kill -- and that people have the right and duty to get details that certain elements won't et you have, and that the people with a stake in certain versions of the official line will go to any length to keep you in the dark.

To make a very long story short, Dr. Day dictated a book that I proceeded to edit for her. It soon became a bestseller and still sells briskly to this day. At Dr. Day's recommendation, I met another doctor, Dr. Theresa Crenshaw, who specialized in Sexual Pharmacology. She had two books under contract by a leading publisher, and I became the leading editor of an entire team of writers and researchers that helped her to finish these manuscripts on what drugs can do to the mind and to people's reproduction.

Strangely enough, both Dr. Day and Dr. Crenshaw became quickly controversial, even as we worked together, and I learned a great deal about extremely powerful pharmaceutical conglomerates that seemed to be focused on our destruction rather than our health. Strange to me, both became violently ill with breast cancer at practically the same time. And here is where the story becomes interesting -- though in a way, also sad. These two famous lady doctors chose different paths of combating what was quickly diagnosed as a terminal disease. Dr. Crenshaw chose the orthodox route, and after a long and painful battle, she died a few years ago in agonizing pain. Dr. Day, on the other hand, came from a Seventh Day Adventist background and believed in what I teasingly call the " Dr. Day- Juicing-Plus-Prayer-Diet" to purify mind, body and soul. Today, she is totally healed - the picture of a poster girl - she feels fine and looks terrific! . . .

Return to Dr. Day Responds to her Critics